What annoys me the most about the Katrina devastation is that media is comparing the disaster area and its inhabitants who were unable to leave in time to a third world country. I think it's a shame. Mainly because when one refers to a third world country, most don't think of white people. And the people shown in New Orleans, for example, who are now stuck and trying to leave are mostly not white either. I can see how easy it is to make the comparison to a third world country but it also shows how racist media is.
I am also not sure why all these people are referred to refugees. Yes, they are seeking a refuge but generally, when people are called refugees, it's because they are fleeing from a war, political oppression, or religious persecution. Call me crazy but there must be another word to describe people seeking a shelter.
And, of course, the last point - so why is Bush appointing Bush Sr. and Clinton to head the recovery effort? Can't he appoint them to run the country instead?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
why nitpick over language when people are dying! it seems to me criticism should be placed over the way our leaders are failing to implement a plan of action. it has taken the red cross just as long to have a felt presence as fema. it's a disgrace.
Why nitpick? Well, because labels stick and people can't shrug them off. Psychologically ramifications can be great. Why not survivors, at least? Much more empowering than a refugee. A refugee in one of the wealthiest countries in the world. What the hell is that?
Post a Comment